Scientists should not use animal testing as a source for experimentation because its unethical and i

Facts and FiguresUnited States 1,2 1 million animals used in experiments excluding rats, mice, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and agricultural animals used in agricultural experimentsplus an estimated million mice and rats Canada 3 3.

Scientists should not use animal testing as a source for experimentation because its unethical and i

Scientists have for centuries sought to increase their understanding of the natural world through experiments on live animals — and for as long, critics have argued that such experiments are cruel, unethical and unecessary.

But has such research contributed to human progress, particularly in the field of medicine, which could not have been achieved through other means — and if so, can it not be justified on the basis that our needs are of greater significance than those of animals?

If researchers believe, on the basis of evidence, that their experiments on live animals could help protect human lives, how can they justify not pursuing them? If there are circumstances in which live experiments can be acceptable, what controls are necessary to ensure their integrity?

Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint | PETA

He returned to the UK in October and is a regular contributor to the Speaking of Research news blog. Speaking of Research is an advocacy group which provides accurate information about the importance of animal testing in medical and veterinary science. It aims to challenge animal rights dominance of the issue by participating in debates on campuses across the country and using the internet to provide encouragement, information and support to all who care about medical progress.

It also provides accurate and accessible information about how animal research is conducted and how it contributes to scientific and medical progress.

For over 15 years Michelle has championed the cause of animals in laboratories across the world, speaking on their behalf at meetings in both the UK and EU Parliaments, and taking the message to media, regulators and industry representatives from Europe and the USA to Asia. Michelle is known for her dynamic and innovative approach to ending animal testing, and is one of the most respected and accomplished individuals in the animal protection movement.

The BUAV has campaigned for over a hundred years to end experiments on animals.

BBC - Ethics - Animal ethics: Experimenting on animals

It is a widely respected authority on animal testing issues and is frequently called upon by governments, media, corporations and official bodies for its advice and expert opinion.

The BUAV builds relationships with business leaders and decision-makers.

Scientists should not use animal testing as a source for experimentation because its unethical and i

It also analyses legislation and sits on decision-making panels around the globe to act as the voice for animals in laboratories. The BUAV's London-based team coordinates an international network of scientists, lawyers, campaigners, investigators, researchers, political lobbyists and supporters.

The BUAV, which relies entirely on the generosity of its supporters, is a member of several international coalitions working to protect animals from experiments and manages the Leaping Bunny programme which certifies products free from animal testing under the Humane Standards.

Take a group of thirty British children - a typical classroom size in the UK. One or two will be or become diabetic. Two or three will develop asthma. Many will need a blood transfusion at some point. Most will receive anaesthetics during their lifetime around six million general anaesthetics are administered each year.

All are likely to be prescribed antibiotics at some time around 40 million prescriptions are issued per year. Next time you go to the doctor, consider those numbers and spare a thought for the animals that made it possible for those thirty people to lead healthy lives.

The history of scientific discoveries made possible by animal research is exemplary: So what has animal research done for us recently?

Herceptin, originally developed in mice, has had a significant impact on the survival rates for breast cancers. As a mouse antibody now humanised it would not have come about without the use of animal research.

Mice, far and away the most common animals used in scientific research, have also been used in conjunction with stem cell research to create a treatment for macular degeneration one of the leading causes of blindness.The science behind the marketing of foods for antidepressant effects.

Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. If you go online, you can see claims that coconut.

to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. ABSTRACT. Animal studies continue to have a vital role in science development. The aim of this review is to provide to new investigators an overview of the important steps involved in experimental designs and also to suggest some practical information that is commonly associated with this process.

Animal Cruelty Is A Big Problem - According to Olsen (), “the Faroe Islands methods cut around the blood vessel plexus and cervical spine have been developed (spinal transaction method)” (pg).

Cookies on the BBC website

Thanks! Can you add more unique superhero abilities that are not common to other heroes? I’m making my own superhero story, but I have no idea what abilities to give my superhero. Animal testing being unethical is an issue I’m personally on the fence about in spite of the Humane Society’s stance strongly against it, but that’s mostly because I .

Experiments on Animals: Overview | PETA